The effect of chemotherapy cycles on treatment outcomes in small cell
neuroendocrine carcinoma of uterine cervix
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the effect of chemotherapy cycles on survival
outcomes in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of cervix (SCNEC).
Methods: Clinical records of 103 biopsy-proven SCNEC were identified
from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The cycles-dependent effect
of chemotherapy on survival was estimated by restricted cubic splines
(RCS) based cox regression model. Results: Through RCS analysis, we
observed an inverse correlation between chemotherapy cycles and
progression/death; the risks (hazard ratio [HR]) of
progression/death decreased sharply until 5 cycles of chemotherapy.
Long-course chemotherapy (≥5 cycles) was associated with significantly
superior PFS (≥5 vs 1-4: median PFS, 58.6 months vs 25.4 months, P
=0.027) and prolonged OS (≥5 vs 1-4: median OS, 65.1 months vs 37.7
months, P =0.168) than short-course chemotherapy (1-4 cycles). Subgroup
analyses suggested that chemotherapy courses had significant interaction
with FIGO stage; the survival benefit of long-course chemotherapy was
identified in FIGO IIB-IIIC (HRPFS 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.92; HROS 0.41,
95% CI 0.17-0.95), rather than FIGO I-IIA (HRPFS 0.67, 95% CI
0.34-1.34; HROS 0.88, 95% CI 0.40-1.97). Additionally, chemotherapy
regimen was observed to be relevant to survival outcomes; EP regimen
demonstrated obvious prolonged PFS (median PFS: EP vs non-EP, 44.7
months vs 18.0 months) and OS (median OS: EP vs non-EP, 63.3 months vs
41.0 months) than those treated with non-EP regimen. Conclusion:
Chemotherapy with ≥5 cycles significantly improved PFS and OS in FIGO
stage IIB-IIIC SCNEC, whereas a short course of <5 cycles was
adequate for FIGO I-IIA disease.