loading page

Perspectives on follow-up care and research for childhood cancer survivors: results from an international SIOP meet-the-expert questionnaire in Kyoto, 2018
  • +7
  • Marie-Christine Bakker,
  • Vincent Pluimakers,
  • Jenneke Van Atteveld,
  • Sebastian Neggers,
  • Marry Van den Heuvel-Eibrink,
  • Satomi Sato,
  • Kohsuke Yamashita,
  • Chikako Kiyotani,
  • Yasushi Ishida,
  • Miho Maeda
Marie-Christine Bakker
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Vincent Pluimakers
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Author Profile
Jenneke Van Atteveld
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Author Profile
Sebastian Neggers
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Author Profile
Marry Van den Heuvel-Eibrink
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Author Profile
Satomi Sato
St Luke's International University
Author Profile
Kohsuke Yamashita
Children’s Cancer Association of Japan
Author Profile
Chikako Kiyotani
National Center for Child Health and Development
Author Profile
Yasushi Ishida
Ehime Prefectural Hospital
Author Profile
Miho Maeda
Nippon Medical School
Author Profile

Abstract

Introduction Survival of childhood cancer has increased over the past decades. This has led to the development of strategies aiming to enhance follow-up care and research, for which priorities may vary globally. We explored perspectives of an international healthcare workers panel. Methods Attendants of a meet-the-expert session on childhood cancer survivorship at the 2018 SIOP conference completed a survey about their view on important follow-up care and research aspects for survivors below and over 18 years. We analyzed overarching categories and subtopics, and compared Asian versus European and American healthcare workers. Results Fifty-eight participants from different medical specialties (67.2% pediatric oncologists) and continents (48.3% Asia, 39.7% Europe/America) responded. Follow-up care priorities for survivors below and over 18 years included physical care (39.3% ≤18 years, 35.9% >18 years) and healthcare structure (29.4%, 26.0%). Physical care was also the most important research aspect for both age groups (52.5%, 50.7%). Asian clinicians (n=22) primarily prioritized physical care aspects of follow-up care (48.0%, 45.6%), whereas European/American (n=19) clinicians underscored the importance of healthcare structure (43.9%, 34.4%). The main research priority category concerned physical care for all clinicians. Psychological support was the most frequently reported subtopic. Conclusion Physical care is the most important aspect of survivorship care and research according to clinicians from several continents. Asian and European/American respondents shared most priorities, however, healthcare structure was a more important category for European/American clinicians. The most common subtopic was psychological support, underlining also the need to involve psychologists in follow-up.
05 Oct 2021Published in Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology volume 51 issue 10 on pages 1554-1560. 10.1093/jjco/hyab126