Abstract
Objectives To investigate whether the Manchester procedure affects the
risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer. Design Nationwide historical
cohort. Setting The nationwide Danish registers including all residents
with lifelong follow-up. Population All Danish women born 1947–2000,
living in Denmark at one point during 1977–2018 undergoing the
Manchester procedure (N = 23,935) or anterior colporrhaphy (reference
group N = 51,008) during 1977–2018. Methods We conducted a nationwide
cohort with full follow-up. Chi-Square test for trend to compare the
diagnostic stage for the two groups of women. Cox Regression to analyse
the risk of endometrial cancer and mortality. The models were adjusted
for age, calendar year, income level, and parity. Main outcome measures
Number of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, the stage of
endometrial cancer at the time of diagnosis and the cancer specific and
overall mortality. Results During the follow up (median 13 years), 271
(1.13%) women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer after the
Manchester procedure and 520 (1.05%) after anterior colporrhaphy. The
adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for endometrial cancer was 1.00 (95%
confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.16). No difference in stage of cancer
was found (p=0.18), nor when stratifying for calendar year. The HR for
cancer specific mortality and overall mortality after the Manchester
procedure was 0.86 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.15) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.77 to
1.12) respectively. Conclusions The Manchester procedure does not affect
the risk or prognosis of endometrial cancer. Keywords Epidemiology,
endometrial cancer, Manchester procedure, uterine prolapse, pelvic organ
prolapse, vaginal hysterectomy