loading page

Long- and short-read metabarcoding technologies reveal similar spatio-temporal structures in fungal communities
  • +2
  • Brendan Furneaux,
  • Mohammad Bahram,
  • Anna Rosling,
  • Nourou Soulemane YOROU,
  • Martin Ryberg
Brendan Furneaux
Uppsala University Faculty of Science and Technology

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Mohammad Bahram
University of Tartu
Author Profile
Anna Rosling
Uppsala University Faculty of Science and Technology
Author Profile
Nourou Soulemane YOROU
University of Parakou
Author Profile
Martin Ryberg
Uppsala University
Author Profile


Fungi form diverse communities and play essential roles in many terrestrial ecosystems, yet there are methodological challenges in taxonomic and phylogenetic placement of fungi from environmental sequences. To address such challenges we investigated spatio-temporal structure of a fungal community using soil metabarcoding with four different sequencing strategies: short amplicon sequencing of the ITS2 region (300–400\ bp) with Illumina MiSeq, Ion Torrent Ion S5, and PacBio RS II, all from the same PCR library, as well as long amplicon sequencing of the full ITS and partial LSU regions (1200–1600\ bp) with PacBio RS II. Resulting community structure and diversity depended more on statistical method than sequencing technology. The use of long-amplicon sequencing enables construction of a phylogenetic tree from metabarcoding reads, which facilitates taxonomic identification of sequences. However, long reads present issues for denoising algorithms in diverse communities. We present a solution that splits the reads into shorter homologous regions prior to denoising, and then reconstructs the full denoised reads. In the choice between short and long amplicons, we suggest a hybrid approach using short amplicons for sampling breadth and depth, and long amplicons to characterize the local species pool for improved identification and phylogenetic analyses.
22 Oct 2020Submitted to Molecular Ecology Resources
22 Oct 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
16 Dec 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
06 Jan 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
19 Feb 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
19 Feb 20211st Revision Received
01 Mar 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
02 Apr 2021Published in Molecular Ecology Resources. 10.1111/1755-0998.13387