loading page

Citizens' Preferences for Development Outcomes and Governance Implications
  • +2
  • Thomas Falk,
  • Tobias Vorlaufer,
  • Lawrence Brown,
  • Stephanie Domptail,
  • Martin Dallimer
Thomas Falk

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Tobias Vorlaufer
University of Osnabruck
Author Profile
Lawrence Brown
University of Marburg
Author Profile
Stephanie Domptail
University of Giessen
Author Profile
Martin Dallimer
University of Leeds
Author Profile


People’s preferences influence national priorities for economic development and ecological integrity. Often policy makers and development agents base their actions on unclear assumptions about people’s preferences. This paper explores rural citizens’ preferences for economic and ecological development goals and how they differ within and between communities. We collected data from three purposely selected communities representing dominant social-ecological systems in the transboundary Cubango-Okavango River Basin in southern Africa. We used contingent ranking survey experiments, which are a novel methodological advance in policy related research. This included a qualitative experimental design process that provided a broad framing underpinning the research. The contingent ranking itself allowed us to simultaneously assess (i) participants’ ranking priorities for the development goals; and (ii) participants’ preferences for the ordering of those goals. We found relatively strong preference homogeneity within and between communities. Economic development attributes were given high priority across all communities. At the same time, all communities expressed a high preference for a healthy river system providing stable water quality and quantity. This does not mean that our respondents prioritized nature conservation. They showed low preferences for preserving biodiversity and forests which provide less important local benefits than water. This is of high governance relevance. The results point at development domains where policy makers can most likely expect stronger buy-in from citizens. Understanding citizens’ preferences helps to better align national development priorities with what citizens want.
02 Sep 2020Submitted to Land Degradation & Development
04 Sep 2020Submission Checks Completed
04 Sep 2020Assigned to Editor
08 Sep 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
06 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
16 Feb 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
17 Mar 20211st Revision Received
18 Mar 2021Submission Checks Completed
18 Mar 2021Assigned to Editor
11 Jul 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
14 Jul 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
17 Aug 20212nd Revision Received
17 Aug 2021Submission Checks Completed
17 Aug 2021Assigned to Editor
31 Aug 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
04 Sep 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
05 Oct 2021Published in Land Degradation & Development. 10.1002/ldr.4099