loading page

Spatial patterns of leaf δ13C and δ15N of aquatic macrophytes in the arid zone of northwestern China
  • +4
  • Xusheng Gong,
  • Zhiyan Xu,
  • Qiutong Peng,
  • Yuqing Tian,
  • Yang Hu,
  • Zhongqiang Li,
  • Tao Hao
Xusheng Gong
Hubei University
Author Profile
Zhiyan Xu
Hubei University
Author Profile
Qiutong Peng
Hubei University
Author Profile
Yuqing Tian
Hubei University
Author Profile
Yang Hu
Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology Chinese Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Zhongqiang Li
Author Profile
Tao Hao
Wildlife Conservation Chief Station of Hubei Province
Author Profile


The analysis of stable isotope composition is an important tool in research on plant physiological ecology. However, large-scale patterns of leaf stable isotopes for aquatic macrophytes have received considerably less attention. In this study, we examined the spatial pattern of the leaf δ13C and δ15N of macrophytes collected across the arid zone of northwestern China and tried to illustrate how they were affected by different environmental factors. Our results showed that the mean values of leaf δ13C and δ15N in the macrophytes sampled from the arid zone were -24.49‰ and 6.82‰, respectively, which were drastically higher than the values of terrestrial plants. In addition, leaf δ13C varied significantly among different life forms, possibly reflecting the complex photosynthetic fixation and adaptations of macrophytes. In addition to, our studies indicated that the foliar δ13C values of all the aquatic macrophytes were only negatively associated with precipitation, but the foliar δ15N values were mainly associated with temperature, precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. Therefore, we speculated that the determinant of the leaf δ13C of macrophytes in the arid zone of northwestern China is water factors and the leaf δ15N values is the complex combination of water and energy factors.
09 Jul 2020Submitted to Ecology and Evolution
10 Jul 2020Submission Checks Completed
10 Jul 2020Assigned to Editor
24 Sep 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
13 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
16 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
15 Dec 20201st Revision Received
16 Dec 2020Submission Checks Completed
16 Dec 2020Assigned to Editor
16 Dec 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
07 Jan 2021Editorial Decision: Accept