loading page

Sediment particle selectivity and its response to overland flow hydraulics within grass strips
  • +2
  • Mingjie Luo,
  • Chengzhong Pan,
  • Yongsheng Cui,
  • Yun Wu,
  • Chunlei Liu
Mingjie Luo
Beijing Normal University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Chengzhong Pan
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Yongsheng Cui
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile
Yun Wu
Beijing Forestry University
Author Profile
Chunlei Liu
Beijing Normal University
Author Profile


Particle selectivity plays an important role in clarifying sediment transport processes in vegetative filter strips (VFS). 10-m long grass strips at slopes of 5 and 15were subjected to a series of silt-laden inflows experiments with different particle sizes to investigate the sediment transport and its response to overland flow hydraulics. The inflow sediments came from local soil, river-bed sand, and mixed, with median particle size d50 of 39.9, 207.9, and 77.4 μm, respectively. Three independent repeated experiments were carried for each treatment. The results show that when the sediment trapping lasted for a certain length of time, the re-entrainment of some small-sized particles was greater than the deposition; that is, negative deposition occurred, which was not erosion of the original soil. Negative deposition of particles is mainly determined by the particle diameter. The coarser the inflow sediment particles and/or the steeper the slope, the coarser the particles can be negatively deposited. Deposited sediment causes the VFS bed surface to become smooth and hydraulic resistance decrease exponentially. Stream power P is more suitable than shear stress τ of overland flow to be used to describe the process of sediment particle transport in VFS. The relationship between P and d50 of outflow sediment is very consistent with the form of power function with a constant term. These results are helpful to understand the physical process of sediment transport on vegetation hillslopes.
05 Jul 2020Submitted to Hydrological Processes
07 Jul 2020Submission Checks Completed
07 Jul 2020Assigned to Editor
07 Jul 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
11 Aug 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
11 Aug 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Major
29 Aug 20201st Revision Received
29 Aug 2020Submission Checks Completed
29 Aug 2020Assigned to Editor
29 Aug 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
08 Sep 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
09 Sep 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
10 Sep 20202nd Revision Received
10 Sep 2020Submission Checks Completed
10 Sep 2020Assigned to Editor
10 Sep 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
07 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
08 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
15 Oct 20203rd Revision Received
15 Oct 2020Submission Checks Completed
15 Oct 2020Assigned to Editor
15 Oct 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
26 Oct 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
27 Oct 2020Editorial Decision: Accept
Dec 2020Published in Hydrological Processes volume 34 issue 26 on pages 5528-5542. 10.1002/hyp.13964