loading page

Changes in IPCC scenario assessment emulators between SR1.5 and AR6 unravelled
  • +7
  • Zebedee R.J. Nicholls,
  • Malte Alexander Meinshausen,
  • Jared Lewis,
  • Christopher J Smith,
  • Piers Forster,
  • Jan Sigurd Fuglestvedt,
  • Joeri Rogelj,
  • Jarmo Kikstra,
  • keywan Riahi,
  • Edward Anthony Byers
Zebedee R.J. Nicholls
University of Melbourne

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Malte Alexander Meinshausen
University of Melbourne
Author Profile
Jared Lewis
Climate Resource
Author Profile
Christopher J Smith
University of Leeds
Author Profile
Piers Forster
University of Leeds
Author Profile
Jan Sigurd Fuglestvedt
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo (CICERO)
Author Profile
Joeri Rogelj
Imperial College London
Author Profile
Jarmo Kikstra
IIASA
Author Profile
keywan Riahi
IIASA
Author Profile
Edward Anthony Byers
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Author Profile

Abstract

The IPCC’s scientific assessment of the timing of net-zero emissions and 2030 emission reduction targets consistent with limiting warming to 1.5C or 2C rests on large scenario databases. Updates to this assessment, such as between the IPCC’s Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5C (SR1.5) of warming and the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), are the result of intertwined, sometimes opaque, factors. Here we isolate one factor: the Earth System Model emulators used to estimate the global warming implications of scenarios. We show that warming projections using AR6-calibrated emulators are consistent, to within around 0.1C, with projections made by the emulators used in SR1.5. The consistency is due to two almost compensating changes: the increase in assessed historical warming between the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) and AR6, and a reduction in projected warming due to improved agreement between the emulators’ response to emissions and the underlying assessment.