loading page

  • Sharad Gupta,
  • Suman Kumari,
  • Sagar Taneja
Sharad Gupta
Punjab Remote Sensing Centre, Ludhiana

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Suman Kumari
Punjab Remote Sensing Centre, Ludhiana
Author Profile
Sagar Taneja
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research
Author Profile


Regional crop production estimates are important in both public and private sectors to ensure the adequacy of a food supply and aid policymakers and farmers in managing harvest, storage, import/export, transportation, and anticipate market fluctuations. Food security will be progressively challenged by population growth and climate change. Thus, the prediction of accurate regional crop yield is essential for national food security and the sustainable development of the Indian agriculture sector. In this study, we have selected Punjab, the highest wheat yielding state in India. The district-wise wheat yield data were available for the year 2000 – 2019. We have used several covariates for crop health viz. normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), leaf area index (LAI), fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR); meteorological indicators viz. land surface temperature (LST), and evapotranspiration (ET); and surface characteristics viz. protrusion coefficient (PC). These indicators were generated at 250 m spatial resolution from the MODIS data using Google Earth Engine. The whole data was divided into two groups for training (2000 – 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2016 - 2019) and testing (2010, 2012, 2015), which were randomly selected. This study uses the random forest (RF) regression method to create a wheat yield prediction model. We created several combinations of covariates and found that fAPAR and ET are highly correlated with NDVI and do not have much influence on the model’s prediction accuracy. Hence, only four out of six covariates were selected for final training. The coefficient of determination between district-level yield vs. (NDVI/LAI/PC/LST) was 0.37/0.31/0.15/0.13 respectively. We used randomized search cross-validation as well as grid search cross-validation for hyper-parameter tuning. Furthermore, we used mean absolute error (MAE) and accuracy as quality metrics. The MAE for training was 0.1870 t/Ha with 95.81% accuracy, whereas the MAE on test data was obtained as 0.4293 t/Ha with 90.02% accuracy. The results of this study are within acceptable error limits of the published research articles. Overall, this study demonstrates that covariates derived from coarse resolution satellite data can predict district-level crop yield with reasonable accuracy.