loading page

The Venusian atmospheric oxygen ion escape: Extrapolation to the early Solar System
  • +5
  • Moa Persson,
  • Yoshifumi Futaana Futaana,
  • Robin Ramstad,
  • Kei Masunaga,
  • Hans Nilsson,
  • Maria Hamrin,
  • Andrey Fedorov,
  • Stas Barabash
Moa Persson
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Swedish Institute of Space Physics

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Yoshifumi Futaana Futaana
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Author Profile
Robin Ramstad
University of Colorado Boulder, University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
Kei Masunaga
University of Colorado Boulder, University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
Hans Nilsson
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Author Profile
Maria Hamrin
Umeå University, Umeå University
Author Profile
Andrey Fedorov
IRAP CNRS UPS, IRAP CNRS UPS
Author Profile
Stas Barabash
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Author Profile

Abstract

We investigate the escape rates of O+ through the magnetotail of Venus and its dependence on the upstream solar and solar wind conditions, using Venus Express measurements. We find that the O+ escape rate increases with the solar wind energy flux as Q=Q_0*F(SWenergy)^(0.5+-0.3), where Q_0 = 7.1*10^16 for high EUV and Q_0 = 8.5*10^16 for low EUV. As the solar EUV flux did not increase significantly over the studied solar cycle, the variation of the escape rates with the solar EUV flux is not strong in this dataset. Nevertheless, the escape rate decreases with higher EUV as there is an increase in the Venusward fluxes. From the relation between the escape rate and the solar wind energy flux we extrapolated the escape rates to 3.9 Ga. The results indicate a total loss of 3.6*10^16 kg of water through non-thermal ion escape, or equal to ~0.3 m of a global equivalent layer of water, and therefore cannot account for the loss of an historical terrestrial-like ocean (~10^21 kg) in the Venusian atmosphere.
Mar 2020Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets volume 125 issue 3. 10.1029/2019JE006336