Background and Purpose: Currently there are no licensed vaccines and limited antivirals for the treatment of COVID-19. Heparin (delivered systemically) is currently being used to treat anticoagulant anomalies in COVID-19 patients. In addition, in the UK, nebulised unfractionated heparin (UFH) is currently being trialled in COVID-19 patients as a potential treatment. A systematic comparison of the potential antiviral effect of various heparin preparations on live wild-type SARS-CoV-2, in vitro, is thus urgently needed. Experimental Approach: A range of heparin preparations both UFH (n=4) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) (n=3) of porcine or bovine origin were screened for antiviral activity against live SARS-CoV-2 (Victoria/01/2020) using a plaque reduction neutralisation assay and Vero E6 cells. ND50 values for each heparin were calculated using a mid-point probit analysis. Key Results: UFH had potent antiviral effects, with ND50 values of 12.5 and 23 μg/ml for two porcine mucosal UFH tested. Bovine mucosal UFH had similar antiviral effects although it was ~50% less active (ND50, 50-75 μg/ml). In contrast, LMWHs such as Clexane and Fragmin were markedly less active by ~100-fold (ND50 values of 2.6-6.8 mg/ml). Conclusions and Implications: This comparison of a panel of clinically relevant heparins, including the UFH preparation under trial in the UK, demonstrated that distinct products exhibit different degrees of antiviral activity against live SARS-CoV-2. Porcine mucosal UFH has the strongest antiviral activity followed by bovine mucosal UFH, whereas LMWHs had the lowest amount of antiviral activity (by 100-fold). Overall the data strongly support further clinical investigation of UFH as a potential treatment for patients with COVID-19.

Conventional piglets were inoculated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) through different routes, including intranasal, endotracheal, intramuscular and intravenous ones. Although piglets were not susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and lacked lesions or viral RNA in tissues/swabs, seroconversion was observed in pigs inoculated parenterally (intramuscularly or intravenously).

EDITORIAL Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a new disease caused by SARS‐CoV2. Since the beginning of 2020, it has become one of the main challenges of our times, causing a high incidence of severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure and death1. At the root of COVID-19 lies the sudden development of ‘cytokine storms’, hyper-inflammatory responses involving the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, IL-8, and MCP-1) that impair the gas exchange function of the lung and lead in select patients, mostly with underlying comorbidities, to multiorgan failure and death1,2. Additional complications triggered by ‘cytokine storms’ include endothelial dysfunction and hypercoagulation, increasing the risk of thromboembolytic events, and life-threatening cardiovascular complications. Anti-inflammatory therapies are thus being considered for alleviating the damaging side effects of hyper-inflammation with many trials including anti-cytokine biologicals, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and corticosteroids being ongoing3. Surprisingly, among them dexamethasone has taken center stage as initial results from the RECOVERY trial, a large multicenter randomized open-label trial for hospitalized patients run in the United Kingdom, revealed notable efficacy in the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients4.Dexamethasone is one of the oldest synthetic glucocorticoid agonists synthesized in 1957 and introduced into the clinic in 1961. When administered at 6 mg daily, either orally or intravenously for 10 days, dexamethasone was shown in the RECOVERY trial to improve survival rates of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 receiving oxygen or being on mechanical ventilation by a remarkable 30%4. Benefit was restricted to patients requiring respiratory support whereas in milder cases this was not clear. This notable efficacy of dexamethasone treatment goes against the current view of corticosteroid use in respiratory viral infections which remains contradictory. Although corticosteroids improve ventilator weaning and can lower the intensity of the host response to the virus, tempering the ‘cytokine storm’ and limiting immunopathology, they can also reduce viral clearance and lead to more severe disease. Understanding therefore how dexamethasome mediates its effects is of paramount importance.Dexamethasone, as other corticosteroids, is held to mediate its anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects via the glucocorticoid receptor. Upon ligand binding, the receptor-corticosteroid molecule complex moves into the cell nucleus, where it dimerizes and binds to glucocorticoid response elements (GRE), acting as transcriptional repressor or transactivator of diverse sets of genes. This results in the inhibition of inflammatory cell activity, including neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes, and the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and interleukins and other genes such as cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase5. However, we have recently uncovered that dexamethasone can also induce the D-series proresolving lipid mediator pathway leading to the production of 17-HDHA and the protectins D1 and DX6. These are potent major players of the molecular machinery driving the resolution of inflammation, i.e. the proper regulated termination of pro-inflammatory responses involving the catabolism of pro-inflammatory mediators, the removal of inflammatory cells and the restoration of the tissue in a timely and highly coordinated manner7. Although resolution of inflammation has long been considered to occur spontaneously as a result of the waning of pro-inflammatory responses, this is now known to be an ordered and highly regulated process involving the timely production of enzymatically oxygenated lipid-derived mediators such as protectins, D-series resolvins and maresins derived from the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), E-series resolvins derived from eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and lipoxins biosynthesized from omega-6 fatty acids following eicosanoid class switching7. Interestingly, certain lipid mediators have been shown to exert additional non-conventional functions; resolvin D4 can attenuate pathologic thrombosis, reduce NETosis and promote clot removal8 which is now recognized as a key pathology of COVID-19 infection, while resolvin E4 (RvE4) stimulates efferocytosis of senescent erythrocytes in hemorrhagic exudates especially under hypoxic conditions that characterize COVID-199. Moreover, corticosteroids have been reported to reduce fibrinogen and procoagulant factors under pro-inflammatory conditions and increase anticoagulant factors10.The ability of viral infections to induce proresolving lipids has been reported earlier. Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), a major pattern recognition receptor of viral RNA, activates PD1 and PDX production11. Moreover, influenza virus infection has been demonstrated to drive proresolving lipid mediator networks including the production of PD1 which limits influenza pathogenicity by directly interacting with the RNA replication machinery to inhibit viral RNA nuclear export12,13. Notably, in particularly virulent strains of influenza virus such as the H5N1 avian strain, PD1 formation is not sufficiently upregulated, leading to more efficient viral replication and host demise12. It is therefore plausible that the efficacy of dexamethasone in COVID-19 is due at least in part to its ability to induce proresolving lipid mediators that possess multiple anti-inflammatory and proresolving actions tempering down inflammation and promoting its resolution, preventing coagulation and enhancing viral and bacterial clearance (Figure 1) yet are not immunosuppressive . Whether other corticosteroids beyond dexamethasone can also mediate such effects, and to what extent, is not known. Whether inhalable corticosteroids, such as those given to asthmatic patients, can also induce proresolving lipid mediator networks locally and thus prevent the development of severe SARS‐CoV‐2 infection remains to be determined. There is evidence that asthmatic patients exhibit reduced incidence of severe and/or critical COVID-1914.Recently, COVID-19 patients showed increased association of serum arachidonate-derived proinflammatory lipid mediators, e.g. prostaglandins, in severe COVID -19 infections while some pro-resolving mediators such as resolvin E3 were up-regulated in the moderate COVID-19 group suggesting that an imbalance in lipid mediators with a swift toward pro-inflammatory mediators in severe disease may contribute to COVID-19 disease severity15. Although the involvement of proresolving lipid mediator pathways in COVID-19 is an attractive hypothesis, further evidence from human trials is needed as there are no studies at present reporting the induction or modulation of such networks in the context of the various disease stages and treatments. It is thus of uttermost priority to investigate proresolving lipid mediators in COVID-19, in a temporal and longitudinal manner, as modulating these networks either through drug treatment or direct administration of resolvin and protectins agonists has the potential to affect this highly lethal and devastating disease in a way other approaches cannot. Such studies are therefore eagerly awaited.

To the Editor, Sulforaphane [1-isothiocyanato-4-(methylsulfinyl)butane] is a clinically relevant nutraceutical compound present in cruciferous vegetables (Brassicaceae). It is used for the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases and may be involved in ageing.1Along with other natural nutrients, sulforaphane has been suggested to have a therapeutic value for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).2 Sulforaphane is an isothiocyanate stored in its inactive form glucoraphanin.3 The enzyme myrosinase, found in plant tissue and in the gut microbiome, is involved in the conversion of glucoraphanin to its active form sulforaphane.4

There are no proven safe and effective therapies for children who develop life-threatening complications of SARS-CoV-2. Convalescent plasma (CP) has demonstrated potential benefit in adults with SARS-CoV-2 but has theoretical risks. We report on the first use of CP in children with life-threatening COVID-19, providing data on four pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We measured donor antibody levels and recipient antibody response prior to and following CP infusion. Infusion of CP was not associated with antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and did not suppress endogenous antibody response. We found CP was safe and possibly efficacious. Randomized pediatric trials are needed.

Objective: There are many clinical conditions that need to be followed and treated during pandemic like lung cancer. Carrying out health care for these patients who are immune-suppresive require extra care. Method: Among 108 lung cancer patients who has been hospitalized during pandemic, 18 of them with respiratory symptoms were evaluated. Results: Median age was 64±9.4 with male predominance (male n=16, female n=2). Thirteen of them was non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 5 of them was small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nine (50%) patients were receiving chemotherapy. The most common symptom was shortness of breath (n=14, 77.8%), followed by fever (n=10, 55.6%). Findings confirmed on computed thorax tomography (CTT) were as follows: Consolidation (n=8, 44.4%), ground glass opacities (n=8, 44.4%) and thoracic tumour/mediastinal-hilar lymphadenopathy (n=3, 16.7%). Hypoxia was seen in 11 patients (61.1.%). Twelve patients had elevation of LDH (median=302±197) and lymphopenia (median=1055±648). There were 5 (27.7%) highly suspected cases for COVID-19. Any of their nasopharyngeal swap was positive. Two of these 5 patients received COVID-19 specific treatment even they have negative PCR results for 3 times. They responded well both clinical and radiological. For one case with SCLC receiving immunotherapy metil-prednisolone was initiated for radiation pneumonitis after excluding COVID-19. Conclusion: In line with the health policies of the countries and the adequacy of the health system, the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in the management and treatment of complications in patients with lung cancer becomes even more important in this pandemic.

Objectives: There is no standardized and up-to-date education model for urology residents in our country. We aimed to describe our National E learning education model for urology residents. Methodology: The ERTP working group; consisting of urologists was established by Society of Urological Surgery to create E-learning model and curriculum at April 2018. Learning objectives were set up in order to determine and standardize the contents of the presentations. In accordance with the Bloom Taxonomy, 834 learning objectives were created for a total of 90 lectures (18 lectures for each PGY year). Totally 90 videos were shoot by specialized instructors and webcasts were prepared. Webcasts were posted at uropedia.com.tr, which is the web library of Society of Urological Surgery. Satisfaction of residents and instructors was evaluated with feedbacks. An assessment of knowledge was measured with multiple-choice exam. Results: A total of 43 centers and 250 urology residents were included in ERTP during the academic year 2018/2019. There were 93/38/43/34/25 urology residents at 1st/2nd/3rd/4th and 5th year of residency, respectively. Majority of the residents (99.1%) completed the ERTP. The overall satisfaction rate of residents and instructors were 4,29 and 4,67(min:1 so bad, max:5 so good). An assessment exam was performed to urology residents at the end of the ERTP and the mean score was calculated as 57.99 points (min:20, max:82). Conclusion: Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, most of the educational programs had to move online platforms. We used this reliable and easily accessible e-learning platform for standardization of training in urology on national basis. We aim to share this model with international residency training programs.

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and has been declared a pandemic in March 2020. COVID-19 has caused unprecedented and lasting biopsychosocial effects worldwide. All healthcare professionals have faced life threatening risks by attending their daily jobs. The daily emergence of advice and guidelines was necessary to ensure the safety of patients and staff. To this effect, all elective services came to a halt to preserve hospitals’ capacity for dealing with the sickest. This retrospective, descriptive review aims to assess the volume and timing of the advice released specifically relevant to the UK Otolaryngologist. Methods: The search included online advice published in English by international, national and ENT-specific organisations between the 1st of January to the 31st of May. The date, title, source, type of advice and link to the advice was recorded in Excel. The resources were analysed per week of publication. A separate search for peer-reviewed publications was conducted using PubMed Central and Cochrane databases. Findings: 175 covid-19 related guidance’s were identified. 52/175 (29.7%) articles were published by international organisations. 56/175 (32%) were produced by national organisations and 67/175 (38.28%) were produced by ENT specific organisations. The peak guidance production took place in the third and fourth week of March (16/03/2020- 29/03/2020) with 72/175 publications. Of these, 27/72 came from the international category, 17/72 from national bodies and 28/72 from ENT-specific organisations. 13,863 total publications relating to COVID-19 were found using PubMed and Cochrane search strategies; 76% were relevant to ENT surgeons. Conclusion: The challenges faced by the Otolaryngologist relate to the unprecedented, sudden and daily changes to clinical practice. Multiple bodies interpreted the guidance giving an opportunity for confusion and delays in treatments for patients. Implementing a system with clear lines of communication and dissemination of information will improve our response in future pandemic events whilst maintaining a commercial awareness to better use the human and financial resources of an already financially-restricted NHS.

Being able to link clinical outcomes to SARS-CoV-2 virus strains is a critical component of understanding COVID-19. Here we discuss how current processes hamper sustainable data collection to enable meaningful analysis and insights. Following ‘Fast Healthcare Interoperable Resource’ implementation guide, we introduce an ontology-based standard questionnaire to overcome these shortcomings and describe patient “journeys” in coordination with the World Health Organization. We identify steps in the clinical health data acquisition cycle and workflows that likely have the biggest impact in the data-driven understanding of this virus.

A Gynecologist's perspective on the limitations of telemedicine in the setting of early pregnancy diagnosis during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination policies of countries are postulated to have effect on the course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between March 11-June 10, 2020 in a chest clinic in a state hospital in Istanbul,Turkey. Adults with diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction positivity in a nasopharyngeal sample and pulmonary infiltrates in computed chest tomography were included consecutively. Sociodemographic characteristics, body-mass index, smoking status, comorbid diseases, income rates, and BCG-vaccination status were compared between severe and mild patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Results: Study population consisted of 123 adults (mean age, 49.7 years [standard deviation, 13.3 years]; 82 (66.7%) male). The proportion of BCG-vaccinated cases was significantly lower among severe patients than mild patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (68.5% vs 88.2%; p=.026). Mean age (54.0 ± 11.5 years vs 38.3 ±10.7 years; p <.001), diabetes rate (32.6% vs 5.9%; p=.002) and low-income (84.3% vs 52.9% p<.001) are higher in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia than in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.112; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.058 – 1.169; p<.001) and low income (OR, 3.369; 95% CI, 1.074 – 10.570; p =.037) are associated with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusion: Clinical data does not support that being vaccinated with BCG is associated with disease severity in COVID-19 pneumonia. Age and low-income are the major predictors for disease severity.

Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions are common presentations in COVID-19 patients. We present three patients who received smell and taste tests after recovery. The smell test suspected persistent impairment of olfactory function in these patients. The report proposes continued evaluation of olfactory function by a smell test in COVID-19 patients.

Background: The novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19) can progress with mild to moderate or self-limiting clinical findings in children. The aim of this study was to investigate the disease features of Covid-19 in Turkish children. Methods: Children diagnosed by the method of RT-PCR for Covid-19 at the Dicle University Department of Pediatric, between April and June 2020, were evaluated. Hospital records were investigated retrospectively. Results: One hundred and five patients children with the mean age of 108.64±65.61 were enrolled in this study. The most common cause of transmission in pediatric patients was contacting with a family member diagnosed with COVID-19 (n=91, 86.7%).The most common admission complaints were dry cough (n=17, 16.2%), fever (n=16, 15.2%), lassitude and fatigue (n=14, 13.3%) respectively. More than 95 % of all children with Covid-19 had asymptomatic, mild, or moderate cases. CRP was identified only independent factor associated with long duration of hospitalization. Conclusion: The results of this study show preliminary results of a study investigating the effect of Covid-19 on Turkish children. A clear understanding of the local epidemiology of corona virus infections and identification of risk factors is critical for the successful implementation of the prevention and control program.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a comprehensive regulator of vascular and airway tone. Endogenous NO produced by nitric oxide synthases regulates multiple signaling cascades, including activation of soluble guanylate cyclase to generate cGMP, relaxing smooth muscle cells. Inhaled NO is an established therapy for pulmonary hypertension, especially in neonates, and has been recently proposed for treatment of hypoxic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. In this review, we summarize the effects of endogenous and exogenous NO on protein S-nitrosylation, which is the selective and reversible covalent attachment of a nitrogen monoxide group to the thiol side chain of cysteine. This post-translational modification targets specific cysteines based on the acid/base sequence of surrounding residues, with significant impacts on protein interactions and function. S-nitrosothiol (SNO) formation is tightly compartmentalized and enzymatically controlled, but also propagated by non-enzymatic transnitrosylation of downstream protein targets. Redox-based nitrosylation and denitrosylation pathways dynamically regulate the equilibrium of SNO-proteins. We review the physiological roles of SNO proteins, including nitrosohemoglobin and autoregulation of blood flow through hypoxic vasodilation, and pathological effects of nitrosylation including inhibition of critical vasodilator enzymes; and discuss the intersection of NO source and dose with redox environment, in determining the effects of protein nitrosylation.

A document by Jacqueline Montoya, written on Authorea.

Abstract. The Controlled Human Infection Model and specifically the Human Viral Challenge Model are not dissimilar to standard clinical trials while adding another layer of complexity and safety considerations. The models deliberately infect volunteers, with an infectious challenge agent (CA) to determine the effect of the infection and the potential benefits of the experimental interventions. The Human Viral Challenge Model studies can shorten the time to assess the efficacy of a new vaccine or treatment by combining this with the assessment of safety. The newly emerging SARS-COV-2 virus is highly contagious and the cause pandemic disease COVID-19. An urgent race in is on to develop a new vaccine against this virus in a timeframe never attempted before. The use of the Human Viral Challenge Model has been proposed to accelerate the development of the vaccine. In the early 2000’s the authors successfully developed a pathogenic Human Viral Challenge Model for another virus for which there was no effective treatment and established it to evaluate potential therapies and vaccines against Respiratory Syncytial Virus. The authors feel that the experience gained in the development of that model can help with the development of a COVID-19 HVCM and describe it here. Word count: 197

This letter is meant to inform the community of pediatricians/pediatric intensivists that we suspect SARS-CoV-2 to cause life-threatening bronchiolitis in infants and we therefore suggest maintaining a high level of suspicion of COVID-19, irrespective of an initially negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, when other causes of bronchiolitis are unidentifiable in young children.

Introduction. Locking the humanity in their homes, COVID-19 forced people to use the technology at hand to keep informed about the outbreak and to keep close to their loved ones. During this time, even if physical health is theoretically unaffected, keeping calm and sane can be challenging. The aim of this research was to evaluate whether exposure to COVID-19 information available in the digital space has a different impact on the mental condition of Romanian medical staff, compared to general population, particularly searching for depression and anxiety symptoms. Materials and methods. An online survey was conducted from April 6 to 16, 2020 within the Romanian users of Social Media platforms. The questionnaire assessed depression with the WHO-Five Well-Being Index, anxiety with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale and Social Media exposure by asking how often the respondents saw COVID-19 related information on the most popular Social Media channels in Romania. Information about: gender, age, educational level, occupation, area of living and risk category was also collected. The risk categories were defined as no risk, medium risk, and medical staff. Results. Almost 90% of the 402 participants received daily through at least one Social Media channel information related to the COVID-19 outbreak. The Social Media Exposure significantly associated with the risk group only for Facebook and LinkedIn. However, exposure to information regarding COVID-19 was neither associated with anxiety nor depression. No significant association was identified neither between age class and self-assessed anxiety nor self-assessed depression. The self-assessment of depression was significantly more frequent as compared to self-assessment of anxiety. Conclusion. The results of this research are opposite to most of the already published literature. Depression and anxiety could not be correlated with the context of lockdown and excessive COVID-19-related information.

Background: The COVID19 pandemic gripped every nation’s healthcare system and provisions on all levels. In cardiac and aortic surgery, as it is with most specialities, elective surgeries were halted. Aims of the study: We captured reflections, contingencies, and current practices across of high-volume centres in cardiac and aortic surgery globally. We also aimed this study to assess decision on prioritization of the surgical patients, the need for personal protection equipment and choice of preoperative investigations in current dynamic and fluid climate. Methods: A validated web-based questionnaire was constructed and was circulated to the international surgeons amongst high volume cardiac and aortic surgery centres. Their intrinsic feedback on decision making, impact of the lockdown and perspectives for the future ahead us all were noted. Mixed method approach was constructed. Qualitative data analysis was introduced to signify the impact globally. Results: Overall, 23 centers from 18 countries participated in this international study. 91.7% of the respondents stopped operating on elective patients during the pandemic. Majority of the surgeons agreed that acute aortic dissection (87.1%) should be operated as emergency procedure and stable triple vessel disease (87.1%) to be considered as elective procedure. Three-fifth (60%) of the respondents relied on CT chest as a preoperative screening modality. Conclusion: In the present climate where there is paucity of evidence, this will give an interim consensus for the cardiac surgeons. With the increase in cumulative number of COVID19 patients, careful utilization of the resources regarding hospital beds and manpower is of paramount importance.

The current COVID-19 global pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) of probable bat origin, has highlighted the ongoing need for a One Health response to emerging zoonotic disease events, which are significantly increasing over time. Understanding the human-animal interface and its relevance to disease transmission remains a critical control point for many emerging zoonoses. Determination of the susceptibility of various animal species to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the role of animals in the epidemiology of the disease will be critical to informing appropriate human and veterinary public health responses to this pandemic. A scoping literature review was conducted to collect, evaluate and present the available research evidence regarding SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals. Experimental studies have successfully demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission in cats, ferrets, hamsters, bats and non-human primates under experimental settings. Dogs appear to have limited susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, while other domestic species including pigs and poultry do not appear susceptible. Naturally occurring SARS-CoV-2 infections in animals appear uncommon, with 14 pets, 8 captive big cats and an unreported number of farmed mink testing positive to date. Infections typically appear asymptomatic in dogs, while clinical signs of respiratory and/or gastrointestinal disease tend to be mild to moderate in felines, and severe to fatal in mink. Most animal cases have been infected by close contact with COVID-19 patients. In domestic settings, viral transmission is self-limiting, however in high density animal environments there can be sustained between-animal transmission. To date, two potential cases of animal-to-human transmission are being investigated, on infected mink farms. Given the millions of COVID-19 cases worldwide and ongoing potential for further zoonotic and anthroponotic viral transmission, further research and surveillance activities are needed to definitively determine the role of animals in community transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, what are the lessons clinical pharmacology could learn to improve our teaching practice and involvement in research and ethics committees to make sure we are better prepared for the next emergency. Is there something in the light of the hydroxychloroquine hype that we as clinical pharmacologists or our professional societies could have done better? We propose updating the way we teach about drug development, rules and ethics of off-label prescribing and critical appraisal of primary sources when guidelines and top-level evidence are not available. Clinical pharmacology should play a leading role in the future re-definition of processes and guidelines for emergencies such as the one we faced in 2020.

There is growing evidence that climatic factors could influence the evolution of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we build on this evidence base, focusing on the southern hemisphere summer and autumn period. The relationship between climatic factors and COVID-19 cases in New South Wales, Australia was investigated during both the exponential and declining phases of the epidemic in 2020, and in different regions. Increased relative humidity was associated with decreased cases in both epidemic phases, and a consistent negative relationship was found between relative humidity and cases. Overall, a decrease in relative humidity of 1% was associated with an increase in cases of 7-8%. Overall, we found no relationship with between cases and temperature, rainfall or wind speed. Information generated in this study confirms humidity as a driver of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Background and Purpose. Since the onset of COVID-19 many clinical trials of drugs and/or vaccines are continuing and new ones are introduce daily. Yet the international research process failed to develop a preventative vaccine or potent therapeutic drugs for relieving the severity of the disease. Therefore, at present the best recommendation to people to slow the spread of the disease is; please stay at home and maintain social distancing! Experimental approach. Many aspects of pharmacotherapeutic mechanism of action of some previously approved drugs with anti-inflammatory effects, such as colchicine, in various disorders is not fully understood. Therefore, many potential therapeutic uses for these drugs and its analogues can be imagined. In this hypothesis article, an attempt has been made to evaluate some potential therapeutic effects of colchicine that may be benefit against COVID-19. Key Results. Prophylactic therapy with colchicine regulates the innate inflammatory response by blocking intracellular signaling pathways. This can inhibit respiratory alveolar destruction following COVID-19 pneumonia, which is the main cause of ARDS and death in these patients. Conclusion and Implications Since the macrophage and granulocytes are the main pro-inflammatory mediators in the lung, it seems application of therapeutic doses of colchicine, before the onset of respiratory problems, will protect the lung against severe damages and respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients. Obviously, many clinical trials are required to prove the validity of this claim.

Dear Dr Harky et. al,We appreciate your inquiry regarding our case report. Dr Harky et. al suggested that TEVAR for a Marfan patient could be an unnecessary approach even during the COVID-19 pandemic.We believe in this particular case, the endovascular approach was fully justified as the patient had clear signs of end organ ischemia at presentation. He presented with extreme right leg ischemia with diffuse numbness. There was no detectable distal arterial flow of the right extremity by a Doppler and physical evaluation. Contrast computed tomography scan showed a completely occluded right common iliac artery and diminished flow to the right renal and celiac arteries due to the compression of the true lumen from the false lumen. Preoperative creatinine was elevated to 1.2 mg/dl. She was also suffering ongoing right kidney malperfusion.It was during the time when COVID-19 epidemic started spreading rapidly in New York City. Our hospital beds were filled with COVID-19 patients and there was a shortage of medical supplies with no ventilators immediately available. It was important to reduce exposure of the individual to the hospital environment and minimize length of stay and ventilator needs. As such, we chose to proceed with TEVAR to minimize the risk of lung injury which can occur in open repair. Postoperative respiratory failure is a major issue in open thoracic aortic repair [1]. The patient did not have a risk of respiratory comorbidities but we believed that this pandemic placed all patients at risk for contracting COVID-19 and subsequent acute respiratory distress [2].Due to the high risk of spinal cord ischemia in this particular patient, we performed TEVAR with a distal bare metal component to preserve the blood flow into spinal cord arteries [3]. The initial clinical treatment plan was to perform the TEVAR as a bridge to open repair. We obviously will need to follow-up with her carefully and if any signs of failure of TEVAR is detected, open repair will ultimately be required.Dr Harky et. al suggested axillary femoral artery bypass to rescue the ischemic leg, however, this patient also suffered malperfsuion of the renal and celiac arteries, so further intervention was required.Thank you for your insightful suggestions.References1) Khan FM, Naik A, Hameed I, et al. Open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg . 2020;S0003-4975(20)30865-1.2) Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA.  2020;323:1406–7.3) Lombardi JV, Cambria RP, Nienaber CA, et al. Five-year results from the study of Thoracic Aortic Type B Dissection Using Endoluminal Repair (STABLE I) study of endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection using a composite device design. J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70:1072-81.